Shuster v. Kaiser
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the Court' of Common Pleas No. 1. of Allegheny county: Of October and. November Term, 1885, No. 124. This was a feigned issué, to try the right of property to certain goods and chattels which Jacob Shuster had caused to be levied on as the property of Julius Kaiser, husband of Theresa Kaiser, who claimed them.
Read the full summary
Error to the Court' of Common Pleas No. 1. of Allegheny county: Of October and. November Term, 1885, No. 124. This was a feigned issué, to try the right of property to certain goods and chattels which Jacob Shuster had caused to be levied on as the property of Julius Kaiser, husband of Theresa Kaiser, who claimed them. The facts of the case as they appeared on the trial before Collier, A. L. J., sufficiently appear in the charge to the jury, and in the opinion of the Supreme Court. The plaintiff requested the court to charge inter alia as follows: Third. That the husband had a right to act…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
In the year 1880 Theresa Kaiser, wife of Julius Kaiser, received from her father’s estate in Ohio the sum of $450; with this money she purchased from Blasius Rauch, and furnished a saloon property at No. 18 Carson street, Pittsburgh; the goods were subsequently insured in her name, and the business was conducted for her benefit from the date of the purchase until the 6th of November, 1881. On the day last named, she claims to have purchased, through Emanuel Weiler, from J. J. Speck the furnishment, stock in trade, and leasehold of a saloon and boarding house, known as the Panhandle Hotel, at…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hannum v. PownallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Phillips v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Britton & Koontz v. NormentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1868