Topol v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*477 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Before me is defendants’ motion to compel discovery of plaintiff’s diary and plaintiff’s motion for a protective order against discovery. I must decide whether the diary is relevant and nonprivileged, and if so, whether disclosure will cause undue annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression. Since I conclude that the diary is relevant and nonprivileged and that disclosure will not cause undue annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression, I will grant defendants’ motion to compel discovery and deny plaintiff’s motion for a protective order.
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Great West Life Assurance Co. v. LevithanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Premack v. J.C.J. Ogar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Psychological Treatment Records)District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
3Cited by12 opinions
- Merrill v. Waffle House, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
- Vanderbilt v. Town of ChilmarkDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Sarko v. Penn-Del Directory Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Jackson v. Chubb Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Vann v. Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon of Springfield, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.