Legal Opinion

Evans v. Stinchcomb

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1942No. [No. 24, January Term, 1942.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

In litigation between owners of two adjoining parcels of land on Gingerville Creek, South River, Anne Arundel County, the chancellor enjoined the owner of one, Evans, from planting oysters so close to the Stinchcomb shore line as to interfere with the Stinchcombs’ use of it for bathing and boating. A later application for an attachment of Evans for violation of the injunction was rejected, and the chancellor made the injunction more definite for the future by prescribing the exact depth of water that the defendant might use. The defendant objects to the procedure by which the change was made,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Emergency Hospital of Easton v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  2. Dawes v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1846

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reed v. McKeldinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Burch v. United Cable Television of Baltimore Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API