Legal Opinion

B X Corp. v. Aetna Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1946PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

Two broad questions are raised on this motion to dismiss each of the two causes of action alleged in the complaint : first, the right of the mortgagee to be paid the unearned premiums upon the cancellation of a policy of fire insurance containing the New York standard mortgagee clause; and, second, the right of an insurance company to cancel a fire insurance policy, at the request of the mortgagor, and without the consent of the mortgagee, and to what extent that right of cancellation is affected by the terms of an agreement pursuant to which the payment of the premiums to the insurance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hastings v. . Westchester Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Eddy v. London Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Lewis v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Aetna State Bank v. Maryland Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  2. Citizens Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Proprietors InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Crotts v. FLETCHER MOTOR CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  4. Andrello v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  5. National Factors, Inc. v. WatersNew York Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API