Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 3, 1968No. 43754PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

The indictment states the offense in the language of the Code (§ 26-2304), which makes it sufficient. Code § 27-701; Jones v. State, 114 Ga. App. 448 (1) (151 SE2d 839). The demurrers raise the issue of whether or not the accused’s alleged act of going upon the premises with dynamite in his possession was such an overt act towards the commission of the crime as is necessary to constitute an attempt. The Code (§ 27-2507), in defining attempts to commit crime, requires that the accused shall have done merely “any act toward the commission of such crime.” (Emphasis supplied.)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Groves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Alsobrook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Hammond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pedro Jose Hernandez-Cruz v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Riddle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Howell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Fears v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. McGinnis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API