Legal Opinion

Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 27, 1913Published

Appeal from Ouachita Circuit Court; George IF. Hays, Judge;

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

On May 16, 1902, appellant, The Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance Company, entered into a written contract with appellee Hamilton, whereby it appointed Mm its agent for the purpose of soliciting and procuring applications for insurance, and agreed to pay Mm a stated commission. On the same day, appellee Hamilton, with the other appellees as his sureties, entered into a bond to said company in the sum of five hundred dollars to insure the faithful performance of his obligations under said contract. The bond was conditioned that he should pay to said insurance company all moneys which came into…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Russellville Water & Light Co. v. SauermanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API