Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Mobile

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 27, 1996No. 1941890Published

1Dissent

Computer software is intangible personal property. This Court has previously so held. State v. Central Computer Servs., Inc.,349 So.2d 1160 (Ala. 1977). The majority today states that the marketing of "canned" computer software "presumes that the information sought will be conveyed by way of a tangible medium." However, whether the software is "canned" or not, the purchaser is primarily buying the intangible knowledge on the software, and the software is incidental to the purchase. The fact that it is presumed that the information will be "conveyed by way of a tangible medium" does not make…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. South Cent. Bell Telephone v. BarthelemySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. State v. Central Computer Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. State Department of Revenue v. KenningtonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API