Legal Opinion
Bayer AG v. Betachem, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 13, 1999No. 98-6427UnknownCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
Bayer AG appeals the District Court’s denial of its motion seeking unredacted documents under 28 U.S.C. § 1782. Bayer contends that the unredacted information is necessary to (1) impeach the credibility of a witness in litigation pending in Spain, and (2) discover additional information concerning a drug master file at issue. Betachem responds that the information sought is beyond the scope of the subpoena, and alternatively, that Bayer already has the Information sought, albeit in a different form. The District Court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Micro Motion, Incorporated v. Kane Steel Co., Inc., Cross/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- John Deere Limited and Deere & Company v. Sperry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- No. 97-5047Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- In Re Application For An Order Permitting Metallgesellschaft Ag To Take DiscoveryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bayer AG v. Betachem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- HALGAS v. BURLINGTON COUNTYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- Marilyn Gaye Piety Foley v. Drexel University, David S. Brown, Roger Kurtz, and Juhwon LeeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025