Legal Opinion

Hauseman v. Koski

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1993No. 93-005PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Appellants Joseph H. Hauseman, James J. Hauseman, Dean M. Hauseman III, Steven S. Hauseman, and Robert C. Hauseman (Hausemans), as co-trustees and interested parties, appeal from an order of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, granting summary judgment in favor of the personal representative of the estate of Maurice Jones, and finding that the recording of a *500revocation of a trust with the clerk and recorder provided constructive delivery to the co-trustees.

We affirm.

The only issue raised by the Hausemans is whether the District Court erred in holding that a recordation of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hackley Union National Bank v. FarmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Springhorn v. SpringerMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Herrin v. HerrinMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Carnahan v. GuptonMontana Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Blazer v. WallMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Matter of Estate of BolingerMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Dern v. DernMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Matter of Estate of Dern Family TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Womack v. Eggebrecht (In re Demis)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API