Legal Opinion
Hanninen v. Fedoravitch
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 27, 2008No. 3:08CV46(MRK)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
MARK R. KRAVITZ, District Judge.
In this action, Plaintiff Amy E. Hanni-nen sues approximately sixteen defendants for their alleged involvement in an investment scam that defrauded her now-deceased elderly uncle, Urho E. Hanninen, out of approximately $700,000 between January 2004 and June 2004. In accordance with a court order entered by the circuit court for Palm Beach County, Florida, Ms. Hanninen brings this action as Assignee of all rights, claims, and causes of action that the estate and trust of Urho Hanninen may have had with respect to the allegedly fraudulent scheme.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- D.H. Blair & Co. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Costello v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- El Camino Resources, Ltd. v. Huntington National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- Wilson v. DIRECTBUY, INC.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Day v. Cornér Bank (Overseas) Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Gilbert Tuscany Lender, LLC v. Wells Fargo BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.