Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1948No. 24039Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

KRUEGER, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing, appellant asserts that we erred in not sustaining his Bill of Exception No. 1 wherein he complains of the court’s action in overruling his application for a continuance based on the ground of insufficient time in which to confer with his attorneys before being placed on trial.

The record shows that on November 13, 1947, the court appointed three attorneys to represent appellant on the trial for the offense herein charged, but he was not tried until the 20th day of said month. The record further shows that Charlie Lee, S. T.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. Mathews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API