Legal Opinion

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,582 State of Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 7, 1978No. 77-1374PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the trial court granting the defendants’ motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim and entering judgment dismissing the cause of action. The basis for the trial court’s action was that the applicable statute of limitations barred the action. The plaintiff now appeals the dismissal order. We reverse.

On October 7, 1976, the State of Ohio brought an action in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado against a Chicago, Illinois law firm and the individual members thereof, that firm being…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duncan Miller v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,425 Biruta Dzenits v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and James A. BillingtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  3. Yvonne A. Adams v. Campbell County School District, Campbell County WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Miller v. GlanzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. TV Communications Network, Inc. v. ESPN, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
  3. Miller v. GlanzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Robert H. Ketchum v. Salvador Cruz, M.D., Spanish Peaks Mental Health CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. Alers-Rodriguez v. National InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API