Legal Opinion
Kapur v. Stiefel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 16, 1999PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered October 7, 1998, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment, and directed the escrow agent to pay the down payment to defendants, modified, on the law, to deny defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment and vacate the direction respecting the payment of the escrowed funds, and otherwise affirmed.
*603Inasmuch as plaintiffs mortgage commitment letter was revoked by the lender after the contingency period, the provision in the contract of sale conditioning…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Creighton v. MilbauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Lunning v. 10 Bleecker Street Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Lane v. Elwood Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Lane v. Elwood Estates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
3Cited by11 opinions
- Blair v. O'DonnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Balkhiyev v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Garber v. GiordanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Applied Behavior Analysis, Inc. v. Greater New Jersey Annual Conference of United Methodist ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Rustum v. PintoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.