Legal Opinion
Moll v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 5, 1984No. C9-83-1629Published
1Opinion of the Court
351 N.W.2d 639 (1984)
Lawrence Donald MOLL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent.
No. C9-83-1629.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
June 5, 1984.
C. Paul Jones, Minn. State Public Defender, Robert D. Goodell, Asst. State Public Defender, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, for petitioner-appellant.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Stanich, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, W.M. Gustafson, Nicollet County Atty., St. Peter, for respondent.
Considered and decided en banc by POPOVICH, C.J., and PARKER, FOLEY, WOZNIAK, SEDGWICK and LANSING, JJ.
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Lawrence…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.