Kauth v. Bartlett
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSabers, Justice
[¶ 27.] I agree with the majority opinion’s determination that the parties raised the issue of deviation and therefore, the referee could consider a deviation. However, I disagree that the statute itself limits consideration of a deviation only to instances where a party raises the issue of a deviation. Admittedly, some of our prior case law suggested a deviation can only be considered if a party raises it. See Wagner, 2006 SD 31, ¶ 9, 712 N.W.2d at 657 (noting the statute “only allows a referee to address deviations when one has been ‘raised’ by a party and only upon the entry of specific…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of VetternackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Kost v. KostSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Stach v. StachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Ellis v. EllisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Vander Woude v. Vander WoudeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.