Legal Opinion

General Building Contractors of New York State, Inc. v. City of Syracuse

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum.

We agree with the Appellate Division that the bid specifications here violate sections 101 and 103 of the General Municipal Law. General Building Contractors of New York, Inc. and the City of Syracuse are, however, the only parties now before us. Because of nonjoinder of necessary parties (Matter of Crisione Bros. v. Solowinski, 276 App. Div. 970; see Matter of Consolidated Sheet Metal Works v. Board of Educ., 62 Misc 2d 445, 449; Matter of Wiliom Coach Co. v. Centred High School Dist., 36 Misc 2d 637, 638), we cannot make any adjudication as to the validity of the existing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wiltom Coach Co. v. Central High SchoolNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Consolidated Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dobson v. Rutgers, State UniversityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. New York State Ass'n of Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors, Inc. v. EganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Empire State Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors v. City of OswegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. J. A. Valenti Electric Co. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API