Legal Opinion
Miller v. Conagra, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 19, 2006No. CW 06-00653PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
| t Insofar as the Defendant-Relator, ConAgra, Inc. a/k/a Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, seeks reversal of the trial court’s ruling denying the motion for new trial, we deny the instant writ application. The denial of a motion for new trial can be assigned as error on the appeal from the final judgment. See Firemen’s Pension and Relief Fund For the City of Lake Charles v. Boyer, 420 So.2d 1323 (La.App. 3 Cir.1982); Moran v. G & G Construction, 03-2447 (La.App. 1 Cir. 10/29/04), 897 So.2d 75, writ denied, 04-2901 (La.2/25/05), 894 So.2d 1148. Therefore, the Defendant has an adequate remedy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leake v. ParsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Moran v. G & G CONST.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- City of Kaplan v. MayardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- Firemen's Pension and Relief Fund v. BoyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- ERI, INC. v. WeinsteinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miller v. Conagra, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Joseph Babineaux v. University Medical CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Project Build a Future and Habitat for Humanity: Calcasieu Area, Inc. v. Block Builders, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011