McDaniel v. Addison
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Aldrich, J., December, 1897. Motion by defendant, Addison, for leave to answer after time, in action by Uucius McDaniel v. E. S. Addison, et al. From order refusing the motion, defendant, Addison, appeals. cite: 48 S. C., 565; 9 Rich. Eq., 462; 50 S. C., 403; 47 S. C., 205; 52 S. C., 134; 36 S. C., 538; Code, 195. n> 0 G cL n> “ I — 1 !£' P Q to to s? ^ GO W o §! 05 K CO ‘ O có Co i? O O Q, to S O Ol ^ ” Ox to OS -
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice McIver.
This is an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge Aldrich, refusing a motion on behalf of the appellant (the other defendants not participating therein), for leave to answer after the expiration of the twenty days allowed for that purpose. The conceded facts are that appellant was served with a copy of the summons, which, was in the usual form, together with the complaint, on the 6th day of July, 1897, and that appellant served no answer within twenty days from that date. Within a short time after the expiration of the twenty…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Lee v. PeekSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Duncan v. DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- Ward v. MILLERSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- Baggett v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Rutledge v. Junior Order of United American MechanicsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.