In the Matter of St. Onge

ORDER

This disciplinary case came before the Court at its conference on September 17, 2008 pursuant to recommendations of the Supreme Court Disciplinary Board (board) that the respondent, Edward St. Onge (respondent), be disciplined. Article III, Rule 6(d) of the Supreme Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure provides in pertinent part:

“If the [disciplinary] board determines that a proceeding * * * should be concluded by public censure, suspension or disbarment, it shall submit its findings and recommendations, together with the entire record, to this Court. This Court shall review the record…