Legal Opinion

Pickard v. Burlington Belt Corporation

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 14, 1968No. 68SC209PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

Case No. 1

Without detailing all of the specifications of negligence, the Pickards and Murray seek to hold T. & J. Construction Company liable for damages upon the grounds that it violated G.S. 14-136, that it violated G.S. 14-140, that it was negligent in burning the field on a windy day, and that it failed to exercise due care in controlling the fire. They seek to hold Clark Building Company liable for damages upon the grounds that it had notice that T. & J. Construction Company intended to burn the field and that it had the non-delegable duty to comply with G.S. 14-136 and G.S. 14-140, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Evans v. . Rockingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Benton Ex Rel. Benton v. MontagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Oxendine v. Catawba County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Maness v. BullinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Boone Ford, Inc. v. IME Scheduler, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. Boone Ford, Inc. v. IME Scheduler, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  5. Boone Ford, Inc. v. IME Scheduler, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API