Legal Opinion

American Surety Co. of New York v. Cove Irr. Dist.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 14, 1931No. 6483Published

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, District Judge.

This suit was brought to recover on a bond given by appellant to insure the faithful performance of a contract made by Sehleuter Brothers, wherein the latter contracted to perform work and furnish materials for appellee irrigation district. Sehleuter Brothers defaulted on their contract. Prior to default, a number of subcontractors and materialmen had been employed by the main contractors and their accounts had not been settled. The irrigation district sued on behalf of the claimants. Decision was in favor of the surety company, appellant, and the case was, in 1930,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daly v. Swift & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hefferlin v. KarlmanMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Burnett v. GlasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Farnham v. California Safe Deposit & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Cove Irr. Dist. v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API