Legal Opinion
Perlstein v. Borough of Monroeville
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 29, 1976No. Appeal, No. 1038 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
This appeal presents a factual situation very close to that of In Re: Appeal of FPA Corporation, 25 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 221, A.2d (1976), except that in the instant ease the lower court sustained a borough’s refusal to adopt a curative amendment proposed by a landowner, challenging the validity of a borough’s ordinance, whereas in FPA Corporation the lower court allowed the landowner to proceed. We reverse.
*491Alfred Perlstein (Perlstein) is the owner of 94 acres of land situated in the Borough of Monroeville (borough) in an “S Conservancy” zoning district. On March…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Casey v. ZONING HEAR. BD. OF WARWICK TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Ellick v. Bd. of Spvrs., Worcester Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Lhormer v. BowenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Boron Oil Co. v. KimpleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Robin Corp., Aplnt. v. Bd. of Spvrs., LptCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Levin v. St. Peter's SchoolCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Highley v. East Whiteland TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Board of Supervisors v. BarnessCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Perlstein v. Municipality of MonroevilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977