Legal Opinion

dePombo v. Irinox North America, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided May 18, 2020No. 1:20-cv-20533Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 20-cv-20533-BLOOM/Louis FRANCISCO J. DE POMBO, and all others similarly situated under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), Plaintiff, v. IRINOX NORTH AMERICA, INC. and JOHN HORVATH, individually, Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendants IRINOX North America, Inc.’s and John Horvath’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Compel Arbitration/Dismiss and for Attorneys’ Fees, ECF No. [7] (“Motion”). Plaintiff Francisco De Pombo (“Plaintiff”) filed a Response in Opposition, ECF No. [16]…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API