Legal Opinion

Ball v. Johns-Manville Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1993No. 3054PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This appeal raises issues relating to the quantum of evidence necessary to establish product nexus in an asbestos case. These issues arise both in the context of the plaintiffs case against non-settled defendants and in the context of the non-settling defendants’ cross-claims against other defendants who either settled, filed for bankruptcy or were dismissed on summary judgment prior to trial.

Plaintiffs-appellees, Russell Ball and his wife Ethel, brought this action in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County claiming damages due to Mr. Ball’s occupational exposure to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Eckenrod v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Walton v. Avco Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hoy v. AngeloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Green v. General Motors Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  3. Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Wenk, J. v. State Farm Fire and CasualtySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Hyrcza v. West Penn Allegheny Health System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API