Colodney v. New York Coffee & Sugar Exchange, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
This proceeding brought under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act is barred by the Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1286). The petition patently demonstrates that the proceeding was begun more than four months after a determination by respondent censuring petitioners for improper business conduct (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1293; Matter of Mahony v. Conway, 281 App. Div. 1057; Matter of Endig v. McGoldrick, 282 App. Div. 677). The determination involved the exercise of discretion and judgment encompassed by subdivision 2 of section 1284 of the Civil Practice Act, and cannot be reviewed for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foy v. BrennanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Mahony v. ConwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Matter of Weldon v. RheinsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Colodney v. New York Coffee & Sugar Exchange, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1956
- Endig v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953