Legal Opinion

Barclay v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 29, 1980No. 2 CA-CIV 3439PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

The pivotal question in this appeal is whether submission of a medical malpractice action to a medical liability review panel is mandatory under the provisions of A.R.S. Sec. 12-561 et seq., concerning actions relating to health care. If under the circumstances presented here, the question is answered in the affirmative, we need not consider the other questions raised by appellant.

On April 22, 1977, a complaint was filed in superior court by plaintiff Barclay against defendant Jones, a chiropractor. She alleged that Jones was a licensed health care provider within…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Austin v. Boston University HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Jackson v. Biscayne Medical CenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Stearns-Roger Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Corridan v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Flores v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Daou v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Flores v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API