Springer v. Cox
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Justice.
1. We can not sanction the construction placed on the will by the trial judge that the testator had no intention to create a trust. “In the construction of wills precedents are of but little or doubtful value, since no two wills are alike and each is a law unto itself. . . It is the duty of the court to ascertain the intention of the testator, and give effect thereto, unless it violates some fixed rule of law, and in ascertaining the intention of the testator, sentences may be transposed, connecting conjunctions changed, and omitted words supplied.” Davant v. Shaw, 206 Ga.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cates v. CatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Davant v. ShawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Smith v. FrancisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Lewis v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lummus Supply Co. v. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Reliance Trust Co. v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Lovett v. PeavySupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- McWaters v. Frederick W. Berens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Ivey v. GroganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.