Legal Opinion
In re Shults
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 12, 1904No. 1,513PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Bankruptcy. On questions certified from referee.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
This is a review of the decision of Darrin, referee, refusing to allow the claimants to set off certain claims transferred to them against their liability to the bankrupts. Prior to June 23, 1903, Catherine Shults and Rose Mark, as copart*574ners, carried on the business of private bankers in Cohocton, N. Y., under the firm name of W. J. Shults & Co. On the above date the bank closed, and suspended payment, and notice of such suspension was posted upon the outer door of the bank. On July 27, 1903, the said bankers, upon their voluntary petition, were adjudged bankrupts,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New York County National Bank v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Scammon v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Tucker v. OxleySupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- Gray v. RolloSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Spofford v. . RowanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McDaniel Nat. Bank v. BridwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- William J. Rochelle, Jr., Trustee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Bennett v. North Philadelphia Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Emerson v. BroleySuperior Court of Rhode Island · 1919
- Williams v. Frank Levy, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1915