Legal Opinion

Stancill v. Spain

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ActioN by G. A. Stancill against Alafair and Bedmond Spain, heard by Judge Garland 8. Ferguson and a jury, at April Term, 1903, of the Superior Court of Pitt County-Prom a judgment for the defendants the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

OonnoR,, J.

This is an action for the recovery of the possession of a tract of land described in the complaint by metes and bounds, “containing by estimation 122 acres, more or less, and being a part of the land known as the Bensboro farm.” The defendants denied that plaintiff was owner of' the land or that they wrongfully withheld possession thereof. The general issue as to plaintiff’s ownership was submitted to the jury. There was evidence tending to show that Peyton-Atldnson, on July 14, 1847, purchased the land in controversy from one Hives; that, upon his death, in a proceeding for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Francis v. HerrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Jackson v. . SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  3. Etheridge v. . VernoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  4. Quarles v. . JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Page v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Marshville Cotton Mills, Inc. v. MaslinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. In Re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust From Lake Townsend Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. KnoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API