Kent v. 534 East 11th Street
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Catterson, J.
This action reaches us as a result of the plaintiffs attorneys refraining their arguments in a way obviously designed to evade the statute of limitations. This does not salvage plaintiffs complaint but serves only to illustrate why the motion court should have adhered to its original ruling granting summary judgment to the defendants, and not permitted revisitation by granting plaintiffs motion for reargument.
The plaintiff initially asserted causes of action in negligence, constructive eviction, damages and nuisance, but, on appeal she reframes these as causes…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Cobble Hill Nursing Home, Inc. v. Henry & Warren Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Park West Management Corp. v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Solow v. WellnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Havell Capital Enhanced Municipal Income Fund v. CitibankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- PK Restaurant, LLC v. LifshutzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Schwartz v. 170 W. End Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Schwartz v. 170 W. End Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Reinhard v. Connaught Tower Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.