Legal Opinion

Van Valkenburg v. Stone

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 20, 1931No. 7994PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) As said in Dyer v. Martin, 132 Ga. 445, 447 (64 S. E. 475) : “The constitutional scheme of county government is that the powers in relation to roads, public buildings, taxes, and other county matters are to be exercised by the ordinary, except where the General Assembly confers such powers upon county commissioners of a particular county.” As appears from the record, J. .M. Stone as commissioner supersedes the ordinary in Cobb County. When the administration of county affairs in Cobb County devolved upon this commissioner, the power over the roads usually…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dyer v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Dunn v. BeckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. Town of Decatur v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Savannah & Ogeechee Canal Co. v. ShumanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  5. Jackson v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McGinty v. GormleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Walker v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Burke County v. AskinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  4. Claxton v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Burke County v. AskinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API