Legal Opinion

Hoitt v. Burleigh

Superior Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 15, 1846PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Motion by tbe defendant for issues upon certain contested matters of fact to be tried by the jury.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, C. J.

We have settled that a party to a bill in equity has a constitutional right to require a trial by *390jury, of a contested matter of fact, if he asserts that right at the proper stage of the cause. 9 N. H. Rep. 349, Marston v. Brackett.

This right is not to be asserted by plea, as that might interfere with the plaintiff’s right to require an answer, which is also a legal right. After the answer is in, and a replication filed, the court can ascertain and determine what matters are in controversy, and cause the proper issues to be framed. That is a proper stage of the cause, and a motion is the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marston v. BrackettSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1838
  2. Tappan v. EvansSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1840

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Copp v. HennikerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1875
  2. King v. HopkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API