Legal Opinion

State v. Corrill

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1999No. Case No. CA98-07-149PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William W. Young, Presiding Judge.

Thomas Corrill, defendant-appellant, appeals his domestic violence conviction in violation of R.C. 2919.25(C). On appeal, appellant contends that the Middletown Municipal Court erred in finding him guilty of a violation of R.C. 2919.25(C) when he was charged with a violation of R.C. 2919.25(A). Because we find that an amendment of a charge from R.C. 2919.25(A) to R.C. 2919.25(C) changes the identity of the offense in violation of Crim.R. 7(D), we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

On April 24, 1998, a warrant was issued charging appellant with two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DeemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. City of Middletown v. BlevinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. City of Hamilton v. CameronOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. RihmOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CraftOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State v. FairbanksOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. WattsOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. City of Ashtabula v. Tackett, Unpublished Decision (12-14-2001)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State v. CameronOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API