Legal Opinion
United States Steel Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Central Illinois Public Service Co., Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 10, 1975No. 74--2117PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
This matter is before the Court on petitioners’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Stay Pending Review, respondent’s response thereto, and subsequent relevant pleadings by petitioners, respondent, and intervenors.
On consideration of the foregoing, it is
Ordered by the Court that Petitioners’ aforesaid Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Stay Pending Review is denied for the reasons set forth in the attached memorandum.
The effectiveness of this order is stayed until 5:00 P.M., Monday, January 13, 1975.
MEMORANDUM
This Court entered its initial stay on December 20, 1974,…
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fort Pierce Utility Authority v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- City of Huntingburg v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- City of Huntingburg, Indiana v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Southern California Edison Company v. Federal Power Commission, American Smelting and Refining Co., Arizona Public Service Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Southern California Gas Co., Tucson Gas & Electric Co., Nevada Industrial Customers General Motors Corporation, the People of the State of California, Southwest Gas Corporation, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement District, and Johns-Manville Products Corporation, Intervenors. Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles v. Federal Power Commission, American Smelting and Refining Company, Compania Minera De Cananea, S. A. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Company, Kennecott Copper Corp., Arizona Public Service Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Southern California Gas Company, Tucson Gas & Electric Co., Nevada Industrial Customers, General Motors Corporation, People of the State of California, Southwest Gas Corporation, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, and Johns-Manville Products Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975