Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Pro-Football, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 10, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2022-3813Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-cv-3813 PRO-FOOTBALL INC. d/b/a, WASHINGTON COMMANDERS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, the District of Columbia, moves to remand this case to D.C. Superior Court, arguing that this court lacks diversity jurisdiction. Pl.’s Mot. to Remand at 6–12, ECF No. 16 (“Remand Mot.”). It also requests attorneys’ fees associated with its remand motion. Id. at 13– 14. For the reasons below, the court will GRANT in part and DENY in part the District’s motion. I. BACKGROUND In…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Nevada v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.