Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Nomination Petition of Josephs

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 2006Published

1DissentJustice Baer

For the reasons that follow, I respectfully dissent from the Court’s entry of an order affirming per curiam the Commonwealth Court’s decision denying objector, Dolores Cohen-Lowery’s (Objector) petition to set aside Babette Joseph’s (Candidate) nomination petition. Because I find that the Commonwealth Court erroneously failed to review the merits of the case, I would reverse its decision and remand for a substantive determination.1

The facts of the case are straightforward. Candidate filed a nomination petition to be a candidate in the Democratic Primary for the 182nd District of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Nomination Petition of JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. In re Nomination Petition of ShuliCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. In Re Nomination Petition of DiGirolamoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API