Legal Opinion

Christofferson v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1971No. Civ. 27014PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DRAPER, P. J.

— Plaintiff suffered from a severe skin ailment, lupus erythematosus. From October 1954 to January 7, 1960, at the prescription of her doctors, she took chloroquine diphosphate, a drug manufactured and distributed under the name Aralen by defendant Winthrop Laboratories, a division of Sterling Drug, Incorporated. She developed a severe limitation of vision, now diagnosed as irreversible. Attributing this impairment to the drug Aralen, she sought damages from a number of defendants, including Winthrop, the prescribing doctors, the health plan which provided their services,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Toole v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Gottsdanker v. Cutter LaboratoriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Grinnell v. Charles Pfizer & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API