Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided November 21, 1984No. Docket No. 3969-78UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

Held, traveling expense deduction denied because the expenditures were not made while away from home. Heldfurther, employee business expenses and other business deductions determined.

1Opinion of the Court

GARNET E. BAILEY and KATHERINE P. BAILEY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Bailey v. Commissioner

Docket No. 3969-78.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1984-610; 1984 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 60; 49 T.C.M. (CCH) 141; T.C.M. (RIA) 84610;

November 21, 1984.

Held, traveling expense deduction denied because the expenditures were not made while away from home. Heldfurther, employee business expenses and other business deductions determined.

C. Frederick Bent, III, for the petitioners.

Maureen T. O'Brien, for the respondent.

NIMS

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

NIMS, Judge:…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Heuer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  3. Maurice M. Wills and Gertrude E. Wills v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. Wills v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  5. Peter Stemkowski v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pridgen v. Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API