Legal Opinion

Brown v. Allied Steel Products Corporation

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 18, 1962No. 6 Div. 788PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

Appellants filed a bill for injunction, alleging that appellee, Allied Steel Products Corporation, was operating its plant in such a way that the froise emitting therefrom constituted a nuisance. After a hearing, the trial court denied the relief sought and dismissed the bill. This appeal followed.

The Industrial Development Board of Cordova was seeking industry for location in or near Cordova. As an inducement to appellee to locate a steel fabricating plant there, the Board purchased ten acres just outside the city limits for $5,000 and deeded it to appellee for the location…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brede v. Minnesota Crushed Stone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Rouse v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Clifton Iron Co. v. DyeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. 1st Avenue Coal & Lumber Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Hundley v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coleman v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  2. Fowler v. Fayco, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  3. Daniels v. ChapuisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Patterson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Fowler v. Fayco, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API