Legal Opinion

State v. . Wells

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The essential elements of the offense of which the defendant was convicted are: (1) Seduction, (2) of an innocent and virtuous woman, (3) under promise of marriage. The statute contains the additional proviso that the unsupported testimony of the woman shall not be sufficient to convict. C. S., 4339. S. v. Forbes, ante, 567; S. v. McDade, 208 N. C., 197; S. v. Crook, 189 N. C., 545.

In order to convict, the burden of proof is upon the State to show beyond a reasonable doubt that the seduction was accomplished under and by means of the promise of marriage, and that the prosecutrix was at that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. . LangSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. State v. . McDadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. State v. . ShatleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API