Camden Fire Insurance v. Prezioso
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
Backes, V. C.
The complainant insured the defendant against loss of her automobile resulting from fire, theft or collision. The policy contains the usual clause subrogating the insurance company to the rights of the insured' against tort-feasors. In collision with a trolley car of the Public Service Bailwa3r Company, the defendant was injured and her automobile wrecked. The damage to the automobile was appraised and adjusted at $715.69, which was paid by the insurance company to the defendant. Before this and shortly after the accident, and while the defendant was still sick abecl, an agent of…
2Cited by10 opinions
- U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchenSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Melick v. StanleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Morgan v. WartenbeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Charnecky v. American Reliance Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Culver v. Ins. Co. of North Amer.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.