Legal Opinion

Black v. Bell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1984No. 48115PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, P.J.

Following jury verdicts for the plaintiff driver and the plaintiff passenger on their respective personal injury claims, they sought prejudgment interest pursuant to R.C. 1343.03(C). The jury’s verdict found damages for the driver at $87,200 and for the passenger at $30,000. The court conducted an evidentiary hearing on plaintiffs’ motion and ordered that they were “entitled to interest from the date of the accident.” Defendant appeals, arguing (1) the evidence does not support the findings necessary for that prejudgment interest order, and (2) the statute authorizing prejudgment interest…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Cohen v. Lamko, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hardiman v. Zep Manufacturing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Cox v. Fisher Fazio Foods, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sindel v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Duren v. Suburban Community HospitalCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1985
  3. Walworth v. Bp Oil Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Loder v. BurgerOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Broadstone v. QuillenOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API