Legal Opinion

State v. Laine

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1980No. 16768PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

Defendant Norman Laine appeals his conviction by a jury of theft by deception in violation of Sections 76-6-405 and 76-6-412, Utah Code Ann., 1953, as amended.1 The errors assigned are in rulings on evidence and in instructions to the jury.

On May 30, 1979, defendant went to the University Lincoln-Mercury dealership in Provo and negotiated for the purchase of a new Lincoln automobile. The car and the price of $14,930 were agreed upon, and a contract was prepared and signed. Upon his representation that he needed the car to go directly to the bank in Springville, approximately…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Kupka v. MoreyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Thomas v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. PugaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  2. State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. RobertsUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. ReedyUtah Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API