Legal Opinion

Heaton v. Hayes

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 14, 1939No. 12794PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

1. The motion for a new trial complains of the admission of evidence over “objection” of the claimant, without at the same time stating to the judge the ground of objection. This assignment of error does not properly present any question for decision. Eastmore v. Bunkley, 113 Ga. 637 (39 S. E. 105); Pusser v. Thompson, 147 Ga. 60 (2) (22 S. E. 866); Hill v. State, 148 Ga. 521 (2) (97 S. E. 442).

2. Testimony of the claimant as to his conversation with the father (since deceased) of the plaintiff, to the effect that plaintiff had given him permission to purchase…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Faircloth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. Eastmore v. BunkleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. American National Bank v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Pusser v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Edmonds v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Mabry v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  3. Braswell v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Murray v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Edmonds v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API