Legal Opinion
State v. Blumenstein
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 1925PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.
Question number 1 reads as follows:
“Was the search warrant void because the justice did not at the time he examined the witness under oath reduce the testimony to writing, in view of the statement of your honorable court in the Baltes Case, namely, ‘The procedure indicated and which should be followed in the issuance of search warrants is that the magistrate should examine under oath the applicant for the search warrant and his-witnesses and should reduce their sworn testimony to writing, or at least so much thereof as he relied upon in issuing the warrant, and then if he finds from all the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BaltesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- State ex rel. Long v. KeyesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. DavieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- State v. LeichamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Murphy v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Glodowski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- Meno v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. TyeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. Bobby L. TateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.