Legal Opinion

Town of North Hempstead v. . Leeds

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 24, 1917, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court. The action was in ejectment to recover- certain lands under water in the town of North Hempstead known as the Piándome mill pond.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 24, 1917, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court. The action was in ejectment to recover- certain lands under water in the town of North Hempstead known as the Piándome mill pond. The plaintiff claimed that the pond was a part of Manhasset bay and that it had titlé under the Kieft patent of 1644 and the Dongan patent of 1685. The defendant claimed under an alleged record title from the town. The…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: Crane J.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lawyers Title & Trust Co. v. HewlettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API