Legal Opinion

Siddiqui v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 26, 2002No. 01-2043PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

On July 28, 2000, Iftikhar Siddiqui, a 39-year-old native and citizen of Pakistan, who has resided illegally in the United States since approximately 1987, filed a motion before the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) to reopen his case, seeking relief under three sources: asylum under 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a), withholding of deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1253(h), and for deferral of deportation under Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment (“CAT”), as implemented by the Immigration and Naturalization Service in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Julio Lozada v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. Catholic Social Services, Inc. v. MeeseDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1988
  5. Siddiqui v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Igli Filja, Luljeta Filja, Endrit Filja v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. Filja v. Atty Gen USACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API