Legal Opinion

Application of Oklahoma Turnpike Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1961No. 39733Published

1Opinion of the Court

365 P.2d 345 (1961)

Application of OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY for the Approval of $56,500,000 Turnpike Revenue Bonds for the Southwestern Project.

No. 39733.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

September 21, 1961.

Rehearing Denied October 3, 1961.

Looney, Watts, Looney, Nichols & Johnson, Reynolds & Ridings, and R.L. Vaughan, Oklahoma City, for Oklahoma Turnpike Authority.

Norman & Wheeler, Chester Norman, Chal Wheeler and Andrew C. Wilcoxen, Muskogee, for protestants John Russell and Bill Harrower.

Charles R. Nesbitt, Oklahoma City, James C. Hamill, Oklahoma City, of counsel, for protestant Bill Hoover.

B.H.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Application of Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Application of Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. In Re Board of Regents for Oklahoma Agricultural & Mechanical CollegesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API