Legal Opinion
Nat. Surety Corporation v. Buckles
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided September 17, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.
After studying the case very carefully, we find that the very able opinion of the Chancellor herein fully sets forth the facts in which we concur, and the proper legal conclusions. We therefore adopt in toto said opinion, which is as follows:
“Complainant sues to recover $1030.00 paid by it to the State of Tennessee on August 25, 1942, under claim made by the State on fidelity bond in the penalty of $2500.00, executed by the Surety Corporation covering Claude J. Buckles, previously employed by the State as a highway patrolman. The cause of action is based on the surety’s right to exoneration…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hunt v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
- Third Nat. Bank v. American Equitable Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. BurtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- Illinois Surety Co. v. MaguireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Transamerica Insurance Company v. Harry BloomfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Criterion Investment Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989
- Johnson v. State ex rel. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
- Gulf Insurance Co. v. Construx, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001