Legal Opinion

Meadowbrook Meat Company v. Catinella

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 11, 2015No. 2D13-1295PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied. The prior opinion dated December 3, 2014, is withdrawn, and the attached corrected opinion- is issued in its place. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained.

Michael Catinella was unloading a truck at Meadowbrook Meat .Company when he suffered injuries from a trip and fall. Mr, Catinella and his wife filed suit, alleging that Meadowbrook had knowledge of and failed to warn Mr. Catinella of an unsafe condition at its facility, specifically a malfunctioning dock leveler. After the jury returned a verdict in favor of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. GillettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. K-Mart Corp. v. CollinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Harlan Bakeries, Inc. v. SnowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. FRED MEYERS AND NINIBETH MEYERS v. BONNEVA SHONTZDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. WhittkeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. TLO SOUTH FARMS, INC. v. HEARTLAND FARMS, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API