Meadowbrook Meat Company v. Catinella
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied. The prior opinion dated December 3, 2014, is withdrawn, and the attached corrected opinion- is issued in its place. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained.
Michael Catinella was unloading a truck at Meadowbrook Meat .Company when he suffered injuries from a trip and fall. Mr, Catinella and his wife filed suit, alleging that Meadowbrook had knowledge of and failed to warn Mr. Catinella of an unsafe condition at its facility, specifically a malfunctioning dock leveler. After the jury returned a verdict in favor of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moore v. GillettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- K-Mart Corp. v. CollinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Harlan Bakeries, Inc. v. SnowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- FRED MEYERS AND NINIBETH MEYERS v. BONNEVA SHONTZDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. WhittkeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- TLO SOUTH FARMS, INC. v. HEARTLAND FARMS, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019